1
This assignment and the following two months' work should be written related to your
previous writing. You should not change the stories. Then I will lose the points(scores). If
you talked about improvement of patient flow in the urgent care setting, your next
writing should be something similar with the previous style. I mean you should not write
about totally different topics like cancer patient management or something like that. If
you have any questions, you can ask me. I can give you enough time to complete it. One
week for this job.
Pls read your previous writings. Keep these links unless you remember about your
previous writings.
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473292317
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473883197
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473172845
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473003787
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/472667933
Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft
2
This week, you will bring together all of the assignments you have completed thus far,
and compose the rough draft of your change project paper. At this point, you will have
submitted each section and received feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous
assignment feedback should be evident.
Your rough draft contains all of the expected
components of the final draft and is presented in APA format including a cover page,
references, and appendices when warranted. Your rough draft is your opportunity to
polish previously submitted assignments and combine the sections in a comprehensive
paper that show your change project is ready to be implemented.
You will take this time to identify and address any weaknesses or gaps in your change
project. Your rough draft should only require minor revisions before the final paper.
Your paper should be between 20 and 30 pages in length, not including the cover page,
references, and any appendices. It must follow the current APA manual style and
format. Each section of the paper should be clearly identified using proper headings.
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based
Change Project Paper Rubic (rough draft)
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Paper
Rubic (rough draft)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Introduction and
Background
3.5 to >2.87 pts
Meets Expectations
The change project topic is introduced. All
background information is included. Project
importance within the field or significance
for the designated facility is described.
3.5
pts
3
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Problem Identification and
Description in PICOT
Format
3.5 to >2.87 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the
chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem
thoroughly, including the target population
description and history/background information
at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance
and applicability to nursing is included and well
presented. Includes an appropriate topic
identification related to an advanced practice
nursing issue or practice problem of concern.
Population is fully defined and present in the
research question. Includes specific interventions,
identifies comparisons, and presents appropriate
outcomes in a timely manner for the question.
Overall, the question is well-built using the PICOT
format.
3.5
pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Critical
Appraisal/Literature
Review
3.5 to >2.87 pts
Meets Expectations
The minimum requirement of peer-reviewed
articles, books, or limited non-research literature
(tool kits or standardized procedures) are present.
Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is
credible and timely. Subtopics are used to support
the main topic. In-text citations are present and
correctly formatted. Presents a thorough and
insightful analysis of significant findings related to
the change project topic. Ideas are synthesized and
professionally sound and creative. Insightful and
comprehensive conclusions and solutions are
present.
3.5
pts
4
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Project
Aims, Values, and Desired
Outcomes
7 to >5.74 pts
Meets Expectations
The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes are
well-developed. They are clear and thorough. Aims
include examples of projected features and
functions. Values include implementation benefits
for specific stakeholders. Desired outcomes state the
purpose, have a quality focus, and describe the
benefits that will occur as a result of
implementation.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Theoretical Framework
7 to >5.74 pts
Meets Expectations
Identifies independent theories or conceptual models
that relate to the change project topic and describes
how they will be applied to the change project.
Thoroughly discusses how each element of the
phenomenon applies to the framework. Clearly
applies each element of the theory to the elements
of the phenomenon under study. Develops the
rationale for the sample selection criteria, and
expertly discusses, analyzes, and critiques pertinent
research that uses the framework.
7 pts
5
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Intervention
7 to >5.74 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides keen insight into obstacles and proposes
sound, creative solutions or interventions based on
the literature review findings. Expertly compares
other views on the problem and solutions with detail.
Uses examples to thoroughly address the FNP role in
the intervention and discusses implications for
clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the
implications of the change project and its significance
to the nursing profession and filling gaps in
knowledge. Accurately categorizes and thoroughly
explains specific methods of data collection to be
used. Explains in detail how data will be analyzed and
used. Provides a sound justification for subject
selection and sampling procedure. Accurately and
thoroughly describes potential limitations to data
collection and control.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Recommendations and
Conclusion
10.5 to >8.61 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides an insightful and thorough summary of the
project, main points, and details the significance of
the project to the advanced practice nursing
profession. Provides detailed and creative
recommendations for future research and
implications for clinical practice. Discusses limitations
of the study in detail. Suggests specific directions for
future research. Insightfully considers changes in
theoretical construct and provides reasonable and
creative suggestions for public policy and/or changes
in educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical
framework to the overall product.
10.5
pts
6
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Rough
Draft
17.5 to >14.35 pts
Meets Expectations
Submission shows a concerted effort to present a
high-quality draft requiring minimal adjustments to
content and mechanics. All parts of the research
paper are submitted and efforts to integrate
feedback are highly apparent. Significant and
substantive improvements have been made to each
section of the paper.
17.5
pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Mechanics and APA
10.5 to >8.61 pts
Meets Expectations
Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized.
Information is well organized and clearly
communicated. The assignment is free of spelling and
grammatical errors. All the requirements related to
format, length, source citations, and layout are
followed. A complete reference page is included and
formatted using correct APA format. If applicable,
appendices and tables are complete and
appropriate.The
10.5
pts
Total Points: 70
7
- Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft